There are ~ 230,000 new cases of breast cancer per year, with ~ 41,000 deaths
Breast cancer is the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women
Women have a 1 in 8 lifetime risk of developing breast cancer
5-year survival rates have steadily improved, from 63% in the 1960s to >90%,
likely because of widely available mammographic screening and improvements in treatment
Average Risk Women
Goal is to detect breast cancer that is not yet clinically evident
Benefits of early detection must be weighed against the cost of screening
and the number of false-positive studies that require additional workup
Early detection reduces breast cancer mortality, but controversy exists over what ages to start and stop screening
Screening Modalities
Mammography
Primary imaging study for screening
2 views are obtained: mediolateral oblique (MLO), and craniocaudal (CC)
Digital mammography allows the images to be manipulated for contrast and brightness,
which is more accurate in younger women with mammographically dense breasts
BI-RADS categories classify mammographic findings by level of suspicion, and provide guidelines
for patient management
Clinical Breast Examination (CBE)
Important component of screening because 10% to 20% of breast cancers are not seen on screening mammogram
but may be clinically palpable
Beginning at age 20, women should have a CBE every 2 to 3 years, and then annually after age 40
Breast Self-Examination (BSE)
Limited value in detecting early cancer
Considered optional by ACS guidelines
Important to consider that most palpable lesions are detected by the patient
History of breast cancer increases the chance of a second primary cancer in the
contralateral breast
Magnitude of the risk depends on the age of diagnosis, estrogen receptor status, and use of
adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy
In younger patients, the risk varies from 0.5% to 1% per year
in older patients, the risk is 0.2% per year
Histologic Risk Factors
Diagnosed by breast biopsy
LCIS confers a risk ratio (RR) of 7:1, which is ~ 1% per year
Benign breast disease can be associated with increased risk: severe hyperplasia (RR = 1.3 to 1.9),
atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia (RR = 4)
ADH or ALH and a strong family history increases the relative risk to 9:1
Family History
First-degree relatives of patients with breast cancer have a relative risk of 2:1 - 3:1
Risk is much higher if the affected first-degree relatives had premenopausal onset and bilateral
breast cancers
Genetic Risk Factors
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes inherited in autosomal dominant fashion
Responsible for 5% - 10% of all breast cancers, but 25% of cases in women less than 30 years old
Confer a 50% to 80% lifelong risk of breast cancer, and a 20% to 45% lifelong risk of ovarian cancer
BRCA1 tumors are more likely to be high grade and estrogen receptor-negative
Mortality rates of BRCA1 and BRCA2-associated tumors are similar to sporadic tumors
Reproductive Risk Factors
Related to increased lifetime exposure to estrogen
Menarche before 12, childbirth after 30, nulliparity, or menopause after 55 cause a relatively
mild increased risk of breast cancer (RR up to 2)
Hormone Use
Most common indications are OCP use and HRT
Slightly increased risk of breast cancer in OCP users
HRT with estrogen and progesterone is associated with a 20% increased risk of breast cancer; estrogen-only formulations
do not appear to be associated with increased risk
High-Risk Screening
Screening mammography should begin at age 30
Very high-risk women (BRCA patients or patients with a lifetime risk of > 20% - 25%) benefit from
breast MRI screening, or screening ultrasound if MRI is not available
MRI
Most breast cancers enhance after administration of contrast, making MRI very sensitive for detecting
cancers
However, a very low specificity is a major drawback
Tomosynthesis (3-D Mammography)
Main challenge in screening is the large number of false-positives in women with dense breasts,
which may hide breast cancers
Multiple images of the breast are recorded at different angles and then reconstructed
Masses are more visible in these reconstructed slices than in conventional two-view mammography
Chemoprevention for Breast Cancer
Tamoxifen
Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces the risk of a second breast cancer in the unaffected breast by 47%
Substantially reduces the risk of estrogen-positive cancers developing in women with LCIS, ADH, or ALH
Tamoxifen taken for 5 years has its own significant risks: uterine cancer, pulmonary embolism,
and deep vein thrombosis
Raloxifene
Selective ER modulator
54% reduction in incidence of breast cancer at 3 years of follow up in STAR trial
Significantly less uterine cancers, pulmonary embolisms, and DVTs than tamoxifen
Prophylactic Mastectomy
Reduces breast cancer risk by 90%
Most applicable to BRCA mutation carriers, who should also consider risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy
Statistical analysis shows that BRCA mutation carriers have about a 10% chance of dying of breast cancer
if they do not undergo risk-reducing surgery
In women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, the role of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is controversial
Biopsy Techniques
Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA)
Useful office technique for aspirating cysts, or determining whether a mass is solid or cystic
For solid masses, cytologic examination can determine benign versus malignant, but cannot distinguish between
invasive cancer or DCIS
Core Needle Biopsy
Method of choice for potentially malignant lesions
Performed under mammographic (stereotactic), ultrasound, or MRI guidance
Multiple cores should be obtained
Specimen radiography is done to ensure that the targeted lesion has been sampled
Clip is placed to mark the site in case wire-localized surgical excision is required
Besides histology, specimen should be sent for estrogen and progesterone receptors, and Her-2-neu
Wire-Localized Excisional biopsy
Used when percutaneous core needle biopsy is technically risky because the lesion is too posterior,
too close to the nipple, or too close to an implant
Also necessary when there is discordance between the imaging abnormality and the pathologic findings
Atypical Hyperplasia
Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (ADH)
Microscopically resembles low-grade DCIS, but is of limited extent (<2 mm)
Diagnosis
Usually made after a core needle biopsy of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications
Management
After Core Needle Biopsy
Follow up excisional biopsy is required to exclude an associated malignancy
10% - 20% of cases are upgraded to DCIS or invasive cancer after surgical biopsy
After Surgical Biopsy
If ADH is present at the margin, re-excision is not required
Re-excision is required if there is DCIS at the margin or if the lesion was not completely excised
Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia (ALH)
Diagnosis
Incidental finding on breast biopsies
Microscopically resembles LCIS, but is lesser in extent
Management
After Core Needle Biopsy
Risk of upgrade to DCIS or invasive cancer is < 3%
Surgical re-excision is not required
After Surgical Biopsy
No additional surgery is required, even if there is ALH at the margins
Future Breast Cancer Risk and Prevention
Relative risk of developing a future breast cancer is ~ 4 for both ADH and ALH
Cancer risk affects both breasts almost equally
Patients with ADH or ALH require active surveillance and should be offered chemoprevention
Carcinoma in Situ
Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)
Pathology
Defined as proliferation of cancer cells within the ducts without invasion of the basement membrane
Broadly classified into comedo and noncomedo subtypes
Comedo subtype is characterized by large pleomorphic nuclei, numerous mitoses, and necrotic cellular debris
in the center of the ducts
Noncomedo subtype is characterized by monomorphic nuclei, few mitoses, and the absence of necrosis
Nuclear grade is classified as low, intermediate, or high grade
High grade DCIS exhibits more aggressive biologic behavior and has a greater frequency of occult microinvasion and local recurrence
DCIS in most cases is unicentric, although it may be extensive
Overall survival is > 98% at 10 years
Diagnosis
Incidence rates have increased at least six-fold from the 1970s, likely due to
widespread screening mammography
Typically presents as clustered pleomorphic microcalcifications on mammogram
In rare cases, it may present as a palpable mass or a mass seen on mammogram
Diagnosis is usually made by stereotactic core biopsy
May be difficult to distinguish atypical ductal hyperplasia from DCIS
If a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia is made after a stereotactic biopsy, then an
excisional biopsy should be done to rule out coexisting DCIS or invasive cancer
Entire specimen must be thoroughly examined in order not to miss small areas of microinvasion
Progression to Invasive Cancer
Untreated, some cases of DCIS will progress to invasive cancer (30% after 6 - 10 years)
Comedo subtype may be more likely to progress
Treatment
Goals are to prevent progression to invasive cancer and to minimize local recurrence
Excision Alone
Associated with the highest local recurrence rates
50% of recurrences are invasive cancer
Recurrence rates are dependent upon grade and the presence of comedo necrosis, with low-grade, noncomedo carcinomas having a lower rate of recurrence
If wide negative margins can be obtained (> 10 mm), then excision alone may be adequate treatment
for small (< 15 mm), low-grade, noncomedo DCIS
Excision and Radiation
Considered the standard treatment
Lowest local recurrence rates are obtained with at least a 2 - 3 mm margin
Most local recurrences will require salvage mastectomy, but the survival rate is high
Mastectomy
mastectomy should be strongly considered if the following conditions exist:
Large mass (> 4 cm)
Inability to obtain negative margins after excision or reexcision
Multicentric disease
Centrally located disease
Adjuvant radiation is contraindicated
Patients should be counseled about immediate breast reconstruction
Recurrence after mastectomy will require local excision, and chest wall radiation if possible
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
All patients undergoing a mastectomy for DCIS should also have a SLN biopsy, since this procedure will not be possible
after a mastectomy
For patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery, SLN biopsy can be considered when the risk of finding
invasive disease is high:
Large lesions
High-grade disease
Microinvasive disease
Suspicious axillary nodes on ultrasound or physical exam
Radiation Therapy
Decreases local recurrence rates
No survival advantage
Should be offered to all patients undergoing breast conservation therapy
Hormonal Therapy
Adjuvant tamoxifen or anastrozole reduces ipsilateral breast cancer recurrences in women with ER-positive DCIS treated with BCS
Hormonal therapy also reduces the risk of new cancers in both the ipsilateral and contralateral breast
Women who have had bilateral mastectomies for DCIS do not benefit from hormonal therapy
Lobular Carcinoma in Situ (LCIS)
Biologic Significance
Historically, LCIS has been viewed as a risk factor for developing invasive cancer, rather than as a precursor
lesion like DCIS
Also, the risk was considered equal for both breasts, and subsequent malignancies were more likely to be ductal
than lobular
New epidemiologic data suggests that LCIS may serve as a precursor lesion to lobular carcinoma as well as a risk indicator
for invasive ductal cancer
Diagnosis
No distinctive clinical or mammographic findings
Usually is an incidental finding in a breast biopsy done for other reasons (found in ~ 3% of all breast biopsy specimens)
More frequent in premenopausal women
Classification
2 variants: classic LCIS and pleomorphic LCIS
Pleomorphic LCIS may be difficult to distinguish from DCIS or pleomorphic lobular carcinoma
Treatment
Excisional biopsy is often recommended after a core biopsy result of LCIS, although the cancer upgrade rate is <3%
For classic LCIS diagnosed by excisional biopsy, re-excision to negative margins is not required
For pleomorphic LCIS, management is the same as for DCIS (re-excision to negative margins)
LCIS in association with an invasive cancer is not a contraindication to breast conservation
Careful Observation
Most commonly chosen treatment
Lifelong surveillance is required since the invasive cancer risk is 1% per year
Not risk free, since some patients (7%) will die from an invasive cancer
No role for breast irradiation
No role for a contralateral biopsy
Tamoxifen in premenopausal women, or tamoxifen or raloxifene in postmenopausal women, should be considered for
risk-reduction
Patients will need an annual mammogram, and should have a clinical breast exam every 6 - 12 months
Insufficient data to support annual MRI screening
Bilateral Mastectomy
Chosen for women with a genetic predisposition for breast cancer, strong family history, or for any women who is uncomfortable with
the risk of observation
No role for ipsilateral mastectomy
No role for bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy
Immediate reconstruction is appropriate
References
Sabiston, 20th ed., pgs 837 - 854
Cameron, 13th ed., pgs 697 - 702
UpToDate. Atypia and Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: High-Risk Lesions of the Breast. Sabel MD, Michael.
Nov 29, 2017. Pgs 1 - 22
UpToDate. Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Diagnosis. Collins MD, Laura.
July 02, 2019. Pgs 1 - 13
UpToDate. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Treatment and Prognosis. Collins MD, Laura. April 12, 2019. Pgs 1 - 32