extremely common in Asia and Africa; relatively uncommon in Western Europe and the United States
~25,000 cases / year in the U.S.
long-term survival is ~5%
Etiology
closely associated with cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis B and C infection and alcohol abuse
(chronic liver injury)
aflatoxins of the mold Aspergillus flavus contaminate the diet of many Asian and African communities
many chemicals have been implicated as hepatic carcinogens: nitrites, solvents, pesticides, vinyl chloride,
Thorotrast
obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are now important risk factors
no clear relationship between OCPs and anabolic steroids
Pathology
may present as a single, large nodule, as multiple nodules, or as a diffuse permeation throughout the organ
vascularity is a prominent feature
frequently invades branches of the portal vein or hepatic vein
Clinical Manifestations
small tumors may be asymptomatic and detected only by routine surveillance in high-risk patients
Symptomatic Patients
weight loss and weakness occur in 80%
upper abdominal pain
palpable upper abdominal mass
hypoglycemia or hypocalcemia may rarely occur as the result of a paraneoplastic syndrome
physical signs may include hepatomegaly, jaundice, ascites, peripheral edema, and the manifestations
of portal hypertension
Imaging
Ultrasound
important in screening and early detection in high-risk patients
CT Scan or MRI
contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI are the imaging studies of choice and take advantage of the
hypervascularity of these tumors
arterial-phase images are mandatory to assess the extent of disease adequately
typical features of HCC on imaging are an arterially-enhancing mass with washout of
contrast in delayed phases
MRI may be superior to CT in detecting HCC in cirrhotic livers
lesions can be stratified into LI-RADS risk categories based on radiologic criteria
Tumor Markers
alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has low sensitivity and specificity
specificity and positive predictive value improves with higher cutoff levels (400 ng/mL)
AFP is most useful in monitoring recurrence in treated patients
most consistently elevated liver function test is alkaline phosphatase
Biopsy
not usually necessary since most cases of HCC can be diagnosed by imaging
most common indication is for LR-4 cases where a tissue diagnosis is required to initiate treatment
(ablation, liver transplantation)
Metastatic Workup
most common metastatic sites are the lung, abdominal lymph nodes, bone, and peritoneum
CT chest is mandatory since lung metastases are often symptomatic
bone scan should be done only if symptoms suggest disease
extent of disease in the liver must also be fully determined
Assessment of Hepatic Reserve
critical in determining treatment options for a patient
only ~ 10% of patients with HCC have adequate hepatic reserve to undergo resection
risk of postoperative liver failure after resection is related to the degree of cirrhosis,
portal hypertension, amount of liver resected, and regenerative potential of the liver remnant
Child-Pugh classification or MELD score are commonly used to determine if a cirrhotic patient can safely
undergo a major liver resection, but these tools are inaccurate for predicting which patients
have adequate reserve to tolerate a major hepatic resection
Future Liver Remnant (FLR)
FLR = total liver volume – planned resection volume, as calculated on three-dimensional
CT volumetry
in a noncirrhotic patient, an FLR of 20% is adequate; in a cirrhotic patient, an FLR of 40%
is usually adequate
portal vein embolization can be used to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant,
allowing for a more extensive resection
Staging System
TNM system does not predict survival since it does not take into account underlying
liver function or performance status
several different staging systems are in use: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Okuda, and
Cancer of the Liver Italian Program Score (CLIP)
Cancer of the Liver Italian Program Score (CLIP)
most well validated prognostic system
a score of 0 - 3 has the potential for long-term survival
Treatment
Surgical Resection
offered to patients with resectable disease and adequate hepatic reserve
anatomic resections (lobectomy, segmentectomy) are preferred when feasible
nonanatomic resections may be necessary to minimize the loss of functioning liver tissue
main predictors of survival are tumor size, number of tumors, and the presence of portal or hepatic
vein invasion
Liver Transplantation
ultimate surgical resection
not indicated in patients with tumors unresectable by standard approaches (20% 2-year survival)
treatment of choice for patients with small tumors and advanced cirrhosis
removes both the tumor and the underlying liver disease
Milan criteria are used to guide patient selection: solitary tumor up to 5 cm, or three tumors
up to 3 cm each
5-year survival rate of 70% when the Milan criteria are followed
because of long wait times for a liver, bridging strategies using RFA and TACE can be used to keep tumors
within the Milan criteria
Cryoablation/Radiofrequency/Microwave Ablation
may be used for patients who will not tolerate a resection
may also be used for patients who have multiple tumor nodules
could conceivably be combined with surgical resection
may be done percutaneously, laparoscopically, or open
heat sink effect of major blood vessels limits usefulness, as does a high complication rate
Transarterial Therapy
transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are associated with response rates as
high as 80%
complications include postembolization syndrome (fever and abdominal pain), pancreatitis,
gallbladder infarction, hepatic insufficiency, sepsis
interval treatments required every 3 – 6 months
Chemotherapy
systemic chemotherapy is ineffective
sorafenib, which inhibits cell growth and angiogenesis, confers a small survival advantage
over placebo
Fibrolamellar Carcinoma (FLC)
Epidemiology
accounts for < 1% of all primary liver tumors
occurs mainly in young patients (average age of diagnosis = 39)
cirrhosis and chronic viral hepatitis are not risk factors
has a much more favorable prognosis than HCC
Clinical Presentation
most common symptoms are abdominal pain, abdominal mass and/or distention, anorexia, and weight loss
patients may also present with metastatic disease to the regional nodes, lungs, and peritoneum
Diagnosis
CT Scan
FLC appears as a large, sharply defined, heterogeneously enhancing mass within a
noncirrhotic liver
often contains a central scar, making distinction with FNH difficult
MRI
central scar is hypointense, unlike the central scar in FNH, which is hyperintense
Tumor Markers
AFP is usually negative, and rarely elevated over 200
neurotensin is elevated in some patients, suggesting that FNH may be a neuroendocrine tumor
Management
surgical resection with regional lymphadenopathy is the primary treatment
since the patients are young and have noncirrhotic livers, extensive resections are well-tolerated
there is minimal experience with liver transplantation for FLC, and these patients are not prioritized
on the transplant list
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (IHC)
second most common primary hepatic neoplasm
also associated with viral hepatitis and cirrhosis
intrahepatic bile duct cancers have a similar presentation and similar treatment as for HCC
pathologically, cannot distinguish IHC from metastatic adenocarcinoma, so IHC is a diagnosis of exclusion
alkaline phosphatase is typically elevated, and serum bilirubin is normal or slightly elevated
AFP levels are normal
CA 19-9 or CEA levels may be elevated
Metastatic Tumors
by far the most common malignant tumors of the liver
Approximately 40% of patients dying of a solid tumor will have liver metastases
Colorectal Metastases
Incidence
> 50,000 cases/year of colorectal metastases in the United States
most of these are associated with widespread disease or unresectable liver disease
a small number of patients will have isolated metastatic disease amenable to resection or ablation
in these few patients, long-term survival and cure are possible
Presentation
symptomatic patients (pain, ascites, weight loss, jaundice) will rarely be candidates for liver resection
mild elevations in LFTs are common in metastatic disease, but they are not effective as screening tools
most resectable patients are found by serial imaging and rising CEA levels
rising CEA and a solid mass on CT scan is diagnostic of metastatic disease
Metastatic workup
if a patient is a surgical candidate, a complete metastatic workup must be done
colonoscopy rules out local recurrence or a metachronous lesion
CT abdomen/pelvis rules out additional abdominal disease
PET/CT has not been proven to be superior to CT in looking for occult metastatic disease
in select patients, laparoscopy will spare patients a nontherapeutic laparotomy
Natural History
retrospective studies have shown that untreated, but potentially resectable, liver metastases are
associated with a 10% 3-year survival and a 2% 5-year survival rate
5-FU chemotherapy is ineffective as sole therapy (median survival of 12 months)
modern combination chemotherapy with targeted anti-angiogenic antibodies or anti-epidermal growth factor
antibodies show response rates of 50% and median survival of 20 months, but durable responses and
5-year survival are rare
multiple studies show that in carefully selected patients, resection of liver metastases can result in
25% - 58% 5-year survival and a 20% 10-year survival
Prognostic Factors
predictors of poor outcome following resection: node-positive primary tumor, disease-free interval
< 12 months, more than one tumor, tumor size > 5 cm, CEA > 200 ng/mL
traditionally, resection was only offered if there were less than 4 metastases
recent reports suggest that resection for 4 or more metastases can be done with the expectation of
good results (33% 5-year survival)
resectability is now defined by the volume of the future liver remnant and overall liver health,
rather than the number of tumors removed
close or involved margins do not preclude long-term survival, but overall, these patients do poorly
limited extrahepatic metastases (lung) may be resected simultaneously with liver metastases in
highly selected cases
Neuroendocrine Metastases
Natural History
slow-growing, indolent tumors for which long-term survival, even without treatment, is possible
tumors often secrete functional hormones, which can result in debilitating endocrinopathies
Treatment
octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analogue, alleviates hormonal symptoms and may have a cytostatic
role as well
hepatic artery embolization and thermoablative techniques may also reduce the tumor load and improve
hormonal symptoms
Liver Resection
can be considered if all the liver disease can be resected
aggressive debulking (90% tumor removal) can be considered if the patient has refractory hormonal symptoms
that have failed medical management
thermoablative approaches can also be considered
References
Sabiston, 20th ed., pgs 1458 – 1469
Schwartz, 10th ed., 1291 - 1296
Cameron, 11th ed., pgs 328 – 332, 332 – 335
UpToDate. Clinical Features and Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Jonathan M Schwartz, MD,
Robert L Carithers, Jr, MD, Claude B Sirin, MD. Apr 22, 2019. Pgs 1 – 32
UpToDate. Overview of Treatment Approaches for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Eddie K Abdalla, MD, FACS,
Keith E. Stuart, MD. Apr 14, 2020. Pgs 1 - 29
UpToDate. Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Fibrolamellar Carcinoma.
Richard S Kalman, MD, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa, MD. Sep 05, 2019. Pgs 1 – 23