Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation


Organ Preservation

  1. Principles
    1. Hypothermia
      • warm ischemia time of the kidney is only 1 hr
      • hypothermia decreases cell metabolism and greatly increases the time an organ can be preserved
      • induced by flushing the blood out of the organ with a cold solution (4° C)
      • organ is then either stored on ice or machine-perfused at 4° C
      • one deleterious effect of hypothermia is cell swelling, which results from a decrease in activity of membrane-bound ion pumps and a decrease in ATP production
      • in kidney recipients, delayed graft function is significantly more frequent after cold ischemia times of more than 24 hours

    2. Preservative Solution
      • greatly increases the ‘shelf life’ of the organ
      • goal is to create an appropriate physical and biochemical environment for the organ
      • solution must contain osmotically active agents to suppress cell swelling, electrolytes, hydrogen ion buffers, metabolic inhibitors (allopurinol), and metabolites to stimulate ATP synthesis during organ reperfusion (adenosine, glutathione)
      • University of Wisconsin solution (ViaSpan) is the most common preservative solution in use

      1. Suppression of Cell Swelling
        • cell swelling is a major detriment of successful organ transplants because it results in organelle swelling, disruption of the cytoskeleton, and dilution of the intracellular milieu
        • preservative solution must contain impermeant molecules that remain outside the cell and prevent the hypothermically-induced accumulation of water by the cell
        • saccharides (mannitol, raffinose) or anions (lactobionic acid) are used as the primary impermeants
        • osmotic strength of the solution is between 400 and 440 mOsm/L

Kidney Transplantation

  1. Indications and Contraindications
    1. Indications
      • end-stage renal disease from diabetes and hypertension are the most common indications
      • other important causes include glomerular disease, polycystic kidney disease, and lupus

    2. Contraindications
      • absolute contraindications include: active malignancy, active infection, severe cardiac and pulmonary disease, unreconstructable peripheral vascular disease, drug abuse, and predicted noncompliance
      • relative contraindications include: ischemic heart disease, aortoiliac occlusive disease, morbid obesity, and psychiatric issues

  2. Histocompatibility Testing
    1. ABO Blood Groups
      • blood group matching of recipient and donor has been considered essential because preformed antibodies to these antigens will result in hyperacute rejection
      • however, desensitization protocols have made ABO-incompatible transplants possible in elective noncadaveric transplants

      1. ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplants
        • goal is to remove sensitized B cells by plasmapheresis and B cell-depleting antibodies (rituximab)
        • high-dose induction immunosuppression is maintained for two weeks
        • following this protocol, accommodation develops and rising titers of anti-A or anti-B antibodies don’t harm the transplant
        • overall results are as good as ABO-compatible transplants

    2. Lymphocytotoxic Crossmatching
      • sensitization to HLA antigens may occur with pregnancy, blood transfusions, or prior transplantation
      • although it is possible to type for 6 antigens (HLA-A, B, C; HLA-DR, DP, DQ), usually only 3 are typed: HLA-A, B, and DR
      • the closer the HLA match, the better the graft survival
      • recipient serum is tested against a panel of HLA-typed donor lymphocytes (panel-reactive antibody assay (PRA)
      • a high PRA score indicates the likelihood of a positive cross-match with a donor

      1. Panel Reactive Antibody Score
        • quantifies the risk of transplant rejection by determining the amount of HLA antibody present in a patient’s serum
        • 6% is considered a high score
        • patients with a high PRA score wait longer for a suitable organ

    3. Final Crossmatch
      • cells from a potential donor are incubated with serum from a recipient
      • antibody binding is detected using a cytotoxic technique
      • must take place prior to transplantation

  3. Kidney Donors
    1. Living-Related Donors
      • any 2 siblings have a 25% chance of being HLA-identical, 50% chance of being haploidentical, and a 25% chance of being completely nonidentical
      • close to 100% long-term graft survival when a related donor and recipient are HLA identical
      • advantages of living-related transplants include: excellent immediate graft function, better short-term and long-term results, preemptive transplantation and avoidance of dialysis, and reduction of immunosuppression in HLA-identical transplants

      1. Risk to the Living Donor
        • operative mortality is 0.03%
        • no long-term morbidities have been identified although trauma to the remaining kidney remains a concern

      2. Evaluation of Potential Living Donors
        • complete history and physical examination
        • laboratory screening to include hepatitis profiles, HIV serology, and EBV, cytomegalovirus, and varicella serologies
        • urinalysis and culture
        • 24 hour urine collection for creatinine and protein
        • EKG and stress tests when indicated
        • angiogram or CTA to enumerate the renal arteries and veins
        • IVP or CT to outline the collecting systems, ureters, and bladder

      3. Donor Nephrectomy
        • left kidney is chosen, if possible, because its longer renal vein facilitates the anastomosis
        • if multiple renal arteries are present on one side, the other side is usually chosen to make the anastomosis simpler
        • most commonly performed laparoscopically
        • ureter is mobilized with a generous amount of periureteral tissue and is ligated close to the bladder
        • renal artery and vein are not clamped and divided until the recipient iliac vessels have been prepared

    2. Living-Unrelated Donors
      • typically are spouses
      • account for ~ 1% of all renal transplants
      • graft survival is better than in cadaveric transplants

    3. Cadaveric Donors
      • account for 75% of all renal transplants
      • ideal donor is young, normotensive, free of systemic diseases, and brain dead

  4. Recipient Operation
    • oblique incision is made just above the inguinal ligament and the iliac vessels are exposed in the retroperitoneum
    • right side is usually preferred because the right iliac artery and vein are in a more superficial position
    • most common arterial anastomosis is an end-to-side anastomosis between the renal artery and the external iliac artery. The common iliac and internal iliac arteries may also be used
    • the renal vein is usually connected to the external iliac vein. The common iliac vein or distal IVC may also be used
    • the ureter is anastomosed to the recipient’s bladder. A submucosal tunnel is created to prevent urine reflux

    Kidney Transplant
  5. Postoperative Management
    1. Urine Output
      • a brisk diuresis is expected in the early posttransplant period
      • live donor kidneys are expected to function immediately
      • 25% of cadaveric kidneys have delayed graft function
      • urine output is usually replaced cc per cc with 0.45 NS

      1. Management of Anuria or Oliguria
        • first step is to make sure the Foley catheter is not occluded with clots
        • second step is to assess the patient’s volume status and correct hypovolemia if present
        • if urine output does not increase, then a Doppler ultrasound should be obtained to assess blood flow in the renal artery and vein
        • if blood flow is adequate, then urinary obstruction or leak should be evaluated by a renal scan
        • if there is no obstruction, then the patient will need dialysis until the graft begins to function

Pancreas Transplantation

  1. Indications
    • purpose of pancreas transplantation is to reverse or retard the development of secondary diabetic complications (neuropathy, retinopathy, coronary and peripheral vascular disease) while avoiding the risk of severe hypoglycemia
    • patients with type I IDDM are potential candidates as long as they do not have end-stage secondary complications
    • may be performed in 3 different clinical settings: 1) pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), pancreas transplantation after successful renal transplantation (PAK), and simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK)
    • SPK is the most common procedure performed (~80%) and is the procedure of choice in the diabetic uremic patient with potentially reversible secondary complications

  2. Operative Procedure
    1. Management of the Donor Pancreas
      • pancreatic blood supply is reconstructed on the back table with a donor iliac artery ‘Y’ graft anastomosed to the splenic artery and superior mesenteric artery
      • donor external iliac artery is anastomosed end-to-end to the donor SMA, and the donor internal iliac artery is anastomosed end-to-end to the donor splenic artery
      • this reconstruction allows the donor common iliac artery to be anastomosed as a single vessel to the recipient’s common iliac artery
      • common bile duct is ligated

      Donor Pancreas Arterial Reconstruction
      Back Table Donor Pancreas Arterial Reconstruction

    2. Recipient Operation
      • performed through a midline transabdominal incision
      • pancreas is preferentially placed in the right iliac fossa
      • if a kidney transplant is also being performed, it is placed in the left iliac fossa
      • arterial anastomosis is performed between the reconstructed donor ‘Y’ graft and the recipient common iliac artery
      • venous drainage may be either systemic or portal
      • exocrine pancreatic secretions may be drained into the bladder or the small bowel

      1. Management of Pancreatic Secretions
        • in the first procedures performed, the pancreatic duct was simply ligated, but this lead to a high incidence of graft pancreatitis

        1. Bladder Drainage
          • decreases the risk of contamination from the native enterotomy required for enteric drainage
          • allows for early detection of rejection by monitoring urinary amylase
          • anastomotic leaks are easy to treat
          • complications include metabolic acidosis and urinary tract infections

          Pancreas Bladder Drainage
        2. Enteric Drainage
          • performed by a side-to-side anastomosis between the donor duodenal segment and the recipient’s jejunum
          • considered to be more physiologic
          • avoids the metabolic acidosis and urinary tract complications of bladder drainage
          • has not been associated with a higher infection rate
          • 80% of pancreas transplants are performed with enteric drainage

          Pancreas Enteric Drainage
      2. Systemic Venous Drainage vs Portal Drainage
        • systemic drainage may result in hyperinsulinemia as a result of loss of first-pass hepatic metabolism
        • however, no clear advantage has been seen from portal drainage
        • 90% of pancreatic transplants use systemic drainage into the common iliac vein

        Pancreas Portal vs Systemic Drainage
  3. Postoperative Management
    1. Diagnosis of Rejection
      • acute rejection occurs in ~ 30% of patients in the first year
      • timely diagnosis of rejection is a major obstacle to successful pancreas transplantation
      • in combined kidney-pancreas transplants, renal allograft rejection and a rise in serum creatinine precedes pancreatic rejection
      • in isolated or sequential pancreas transplants, the kidney does not serve as a monitor for rejection
      • in enteric-drained patients, increased serum amylase and lipase suggests rejection
      • in bladder-drained patients, a decrease in urinary amylase suggests rejection
      • histologic confirmation of rejection may be obtained by percutaneous pancreatic graft biopsy

  4. Complications
    1. Graft Thrombosis
      • most common nonimmunologic cause of pancreas transplant failure
      • occurs within the first week after transplant
      • early signs are graft tenderness and elevated amylase and lipase
      • hyperglycemia is a late sign of graft failure
      • graft Doppler ultrasound is the diagnostic test of choice
      • surgical exploration with graft pancreatectomy is usually required

    2. Anastomotic Leaks
      1. Enteric Anastomosis
        • signs and symptoms include abdominal pain, fever, tachycardia
        • immunosuppression may mask the presentation
        • CT with oral contrast is the best diagnostic test
        • reoperation is almost always required
        • occasionally, the graft can be salvaged
        • graft pancreatectomy is mandatory in cases of sepsis, peritonitis, or extensive necrotic tissue

      2. Bladder Anastomosis
        • some leaks will resolve with Foley catheter drainage only or direct suture repair
        • persistent leaks will require conversion to enteric drainage

    3. Urologic Complications
      • most frequent cause for readmission to the hospital after SPK transplantation performed with bladder drainage
      • hematuria, urine leak, UTIs, and urethritis are all common
      • conversion to enteric pancreatic drainage may be necessary to manage serious or recalcitrant urine leaks or UTIs (10% to 25% of patients)

    4. Metabolic Complications
      • after bladder drainage, a majority of patients develop a metabolic acidosis as a result of urinary losses of bicarbonate-rich pancreatic secretions
      • most patients can be managed with oral bicarbonate supplementation

    5. Peripancreatic Fluid Collections
      • should be drained if there is any suspicion of infection
      • undrained infection may cause erosion of the vascular anastomoses

    6. Graft Pancreatitis
      • occurs in ~ 35% of patients
      • early pancreatitis may be related to reperfusion injury
      • the signs of pancreatitis overlap with acute rejection (pain, hyperamylasemia)
      • treatment is supportive, and most cases resolve







References

  1. Schwartz, 10th ed., pgs 334 - 345
  2. Sabiston, 20th ed., pgs 649 - 663